|Home Page Commentary 15 Jan 1998|
First, it blocks Jeffrey Zeldman's faboo site for the reason of "criminal activity." Why? One page of his graphics, which he encourages others to use, is entitled "Steal These Graphics."
It also blocks this very site that you're reading because of "sexual/lifestyle." I suspect that what set it off was the fact that I refer to my membership in High Tech Gays and Digital Queers. The funny part is that I tried to go to both of those sites, and they weren't blocked at all!
Just for fun, I went to the site of that hate-filled loonie, RevWhite. I got through to it -- misspellings, broken links, missing graphics, and all -- with no trouble whatsoever.
I don't want any of these sites blocked at all, not even RevWhite's. (If the school district ever teaches an abnormal psychology course it will be a textbook case.)
By the way, please understand that I'm not mad at the district. They agree that my trigonometry tutorial should not be blocked, and they'll unblock it if a district staff or faculty member requests it.
The moral of the story: Blocking software usually is too restrictive in some cases and far too loose in others. Is a capricious blocker any better than no blocks at all?
I couldn't be happier.
1The copyright, trademark, and registered trademark symbols are there so that I don't get a tort in the mail from Redmond for "abuse of the sacred name."
Back to comment index
Back to home page
Back to top of page